Pork, cured, feet, pickled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, feet, pickled
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, feet, pickled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, feet, pickled has 56% more |
| Protein | 11.63 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, feet, pickled has 479% more |
| Carbs | 0.01 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 10.02 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, feet, pickled has 6580% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 946 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, feet, pickled has 2528% more |
| Calcium | 32 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Iron | 0.31 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 13 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.