Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 315 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated has 250% more |
| Protein | 12.78 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated has 536% more |
| Carbs | 1.69 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Fat | 28.19 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated has 18693% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1088 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated has 2922% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 1.05 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, cured, ham, patties, unheated has 52% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 239 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.