Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 176 kcal 90 kcal Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 96% more
Protein 22.27 g 2.01 g Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 1008% more
Carbs 0.52 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more
Fat 9.38 g 0.15 g Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 6153% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0.06 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more
Sodium 722 mg 36 mg Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 1906% more
Calcium 7 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more
Iron 1.01 mg 0.69 mg Pork, cured, ham, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, unheated has 46% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 358 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.