Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 200 kcal 90 kcal Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 122% more
Protein 18.62 g 2.01 g Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 826% more
Carbs 1.35 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more
Fat 13.37 g 0.15 g Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 8813% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0.79 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more
Sodium 988 mg 36 mg Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 2644% more
Calcium 9 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more
Iron 1.37 mg 0.69 mg Pork, cured, ham -- water added, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted has 99% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 232 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.