Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 585 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked has 550% more |
| Protein | 10.06 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked has 400% more |
| Carbs | 0.32 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 98% more |
| Fat | 60.42 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked has 40180% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 125 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked has 247% more |
| Calcium | 36 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Iron | 0.82 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, fresh, composite of separable fat, with added solution, cooked has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 214 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.