Pork, fresh, ground, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, ground, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, ground, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 297 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, ground, cooked has 230% more |
| Protein | 25.69 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, ground, cooked has 1178% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 20.77 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, ground, cooked has 13747% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 73 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, fresh, ground, cooked has 103% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 1.29 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, fresh, ground, cooked has 87% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 362 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.