Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 165 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 83% more |
| Protein | 28.86 g ★ | 2.01 g | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 1336% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.62 g | 0.15 g ★ | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 2980% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 80 mg | 36 mg ★ | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 122% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Iron | 0.97 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Pork, fresh, leg (ham), rump half, separable lean only, cooked, roasted has 41% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 425 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 11% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.