Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked
7 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
4 wins
Nutrient Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 95 kcal 90 kcal Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked has 6% more
Protein 2.63 g 2.01 g Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked has 31% more
Carbs 21.44 g 20.71 g Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked has 4% more
Fat 0.13 g 0.15 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more
Fiber 2.3 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more
Sugar 1.08 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more
Sodium 14 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more
Calcium 18 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more
Iron 1.07 mg 0.69 mg Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked has 55% more
Vitamin C 8.3 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more
Potassium 550 mg 475 mg Potatoes, Russet, flesh and skin, baked has 16% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.