Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 42 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Protein | 0.12 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 97% more |
| Carbs | 10.17 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 52% more |
| Fat | 0.11 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
| Fiber | 5.3 g ★ | 2.8 g | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 89% more |
| Sugar | 1.02 g | 0.87 g ★ | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 17% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Calcium | 180 mg ★ | 17 mg | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 959% more |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 87% more |
| Vitamin C | 11 mg ★ | 0 mg | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 130 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.