Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians)
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 42 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Protein | 0.12 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Carbs | 10.17 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 51% more |
| Fat | 0.11 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Fiber | 5.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 61% more |
| Sugar | 1.02 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 180 mg ★ | 38 mg | Prickly pears, raw (Northern Plains Indians) has 374% more |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Vitamin C | 11 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Potassium | 130 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 73% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.