Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 339 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked has 183% more |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 16% more |
| Carbs | 89.07 g ★ | 21.3 g | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked has 318% more |
| Fat | 0.73 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 62% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Calcium | 72 mg ★ | 17 mg | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked has 324% more |
| Iron | 3.52 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked has 136% more |
| Potassium | 1058 mg ★ | 172 mg | Prunes, dehydrated (low-moisture), uncooked has 515% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.