Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 13% more |
| Protein | 7.08 g ★ | 4.4 g | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 61% more |
| Carbs | 7.29 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 66% more |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 1.92 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 176% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 46% more |
| Sugar | 2.41 g | 0.87 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 177% more |
| Sodium | 409 mg | 7 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 5743% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg ★ | 17 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 29% more |
| Iron | 1.11 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 26% more |
| Vitamin C | 11.6 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 0% more |
| Potassium | 204 mg ★ | 172 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.