Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 17% more |
| Protein | 7.08 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 252% more |
| Carbs | 7.29 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 3433% more |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Sugar | 2.41 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Sodium | 409 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 1036% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 1.11 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has 61% more |
| Vitamin C | 11.6 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 41% more |
| Potassium | 204 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.