Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
6 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
5 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 270 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 343% more |
| Protein | 8.91 g ★ | 3.15 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 183% more |
| Carbs | 23.34 g ★ | 4.8 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 386% more |
| Fat | 15.66 g | 3.25 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 382% more |
| Fiber | 1 g ★ | 0 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Sugar | 10.34 g | 5.05 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 105% more |
| Sodium | 304 mg | 43 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 607% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 59% more |
| Iron | 3.07 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 10133% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg ★ | 132 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.