Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 270 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 200% more |
| Protein | 8.91 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 343% more |
| Carbs | 23.34 g ★ | 20.71 g | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 13% more |
| Fat | 15.66 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 10340% more |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
| Sugar | 10.34 g | 6.48 g ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 60% more |
| Sodium | 304 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 744% more |
| Calcium | 46 mg ★ | 38 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 21% more |
| Iron | 3.07 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has 345% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.