Restaurant, family style, onion rings vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, family style, onion rings
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, family style, onion rings | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 356 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 296% more |
| Protein | 4.89 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 143% more |
| Carbs | 40.72 g ★ | 20.71 g | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 97% more |
| Fat | 19.28 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 12753% more |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 21% more |
| Sugar | 4.68 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Sodium | 692 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 1822% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Iron | 0.71 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, family style, onion rings has 3% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 142 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.