Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 335 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared has 272% more |
| Protein | 11.31 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared has 463% more |
| Carbs | 31.19 g ★ | 20.71 g | Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared has 51% more |
| Fat | 18.37 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared has 12147% more |
| Fiber | 2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sugar | 1.84 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Sodium | 440 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared has 1122% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Iron | 2.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Latino, empanadas, beef, prepared has 291% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 190 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.