Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn has 107% more |
| Protein | 3.48 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn has 73% more |
| Carbs | 26.68 g ★ | 20.71 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn has 29% more |
| Fat | 7.21 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn has 4707% more |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Sugar | 7.42 g | 6.48 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn has 15% more |
| Sodium | 277 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, corn has 669% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Iron | 0.53 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 99% more |
| Potassium | 186 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.