Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 45% more |
| Protein | 7.35 g ★ | 4.4 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 67% more |
| Carbs | 15.75 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 26% more |
| Fat | 9.04 g | 1.92 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 371% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 14% more |
| Sugar | 0.46 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Sodium | 473 mg | 7 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 6657% more |
| Calcium | 75 mg ★ | 17 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 341% more |
| Iron | 0.87 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.4 mg ★ | 0 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 0% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.