Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 93% more |
| Protein | 7.35 g ★ | 2.01 g | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 266% more |
| Carbs | 15.75 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Fat | 9.04 g | 0.15 g ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 5927% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Sugar | 0.46 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Sodium | 473 mg | 36 mg ★ | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 1214% more |
| Calcium | 75 mg ★ | 38 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 97% more |
| Iron | 0.87 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Restaurant, Latino, tamale, pork has 26% more |
| Vitamin C | 16.4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Potassium | 152 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.