Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 255 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 113% more |
| Protein | 9.3 g ★ | 4.4 g | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 111% more |
| Carbs | 46.5 g ★ | 21.3 g | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 118% more |
| Fat | 3.49 g | 1.92 g ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 82% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Sugar | 9.3 g | 0.87 g ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 969% more |
| Sodium | 512 mg | 7 mg ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 7214% more |
| Calcium | 233 mg ★ | 17 mg | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 1271% more |
| Iron | 2.59 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 74% more |
| Potassium | 190 mg ★ | 172 mg | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 10% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.