Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 255 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 183% more |
| Protein | 9.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 363% more |
| Carbs | 46.5 g ★ | 20.71 g | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 125% more |
| Fat | 3.49 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 2227% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Sugar | 9.3 g | 6.48 g ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 44% more |
| Sodium | 512 mg | 36 mg ★ | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 1322% more |
| Calcium | 233 mg ★ | 38 mg | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 513% more |
| Iron | 2.59 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Rolls, hamburger, whole grain white, calcium-fortified has 275% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 190 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.