Rolls, pumpernickel vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Rolls, pumpernickel
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Rolls, pumpernickel | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 276 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Rolls, pumpernickel has 207% more |
| Protein | 10.8 g ★ | 2.01 g | Rolls, pumpernickel has 437% more |
| Carbs | 51.87 g ★ | 20.71 g | Rolls, pumpernickel has 150% more |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Rolls, pumpernickel has 1767% more |
| Fiber | 5.4 g ★ | 3.3 g | Rolls, pumpernickel has 64% more |
| Sugar | 0.4 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sodium | 492 mg | 36 mg ★ | Rolls, pumpernickel has 1267% more |
| Calcium | 67 mg ★ | 38 mg | Rolls, pumpernickel has 76% more |
| Iron | 2.78 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Rolls, pumpernickel has 303% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 208 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.