Salami, cooked, beef vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salami, cooked, beef
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salami, cooked, beef | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 261 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salami, cooked, beef has 190% more |
| Protein | 12.6 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salami, cooked, beef has 527% more |
| Carbs | 1.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Fat | 22.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salami, cooked, beef has 14700% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 1.5 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Sodium | 1140 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salami, cooked, beef has 3067% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 2.2 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Salami, cooked, beef has 219% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 188 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.