Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef has 320% more |
| Protein | 21.07 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef has 948% more |
| Carbs | 0.72 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Fat | 31.65 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef has 21000% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0.26 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Sodium | 1756 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef has 4778% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Iron | 1.36 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Salami, dry or hard, pork, beef has 97% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 363 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.