Salami, pork, beef, less sodium vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Salami, pork, beef, less sodium
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 396 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium has 340% more |
| Protein | 15.01 g ★ | 2.01 g | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium has 647% more |
| Carbs | 15.38 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Fat | 30.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium has 20233% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sugar | 6.21 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
| Sodium | 623 mg | 36 mg ★ | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium has 1631% more |
| Calcium | 94 mg ★ | 38 mg | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium has 147% more |
| Iron | 1.55 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium has 125% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Potassium | 1372 mg ★ | 475 mg | Salami, pork, beef, less sodium has 189% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.