Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef has 79% more |
| Protein | 17.27 g ★ | 2.01 g | Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef has 759% more |
| Carbs | 4.83 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
| Fat | 7.58 g | 0.15 g ★ | Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef has 4953% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 1220 mg | 36 mg ★ | Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef has 3289% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.94 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Sausage, New england brand, pork, beef has 36% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 321 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.