Spelt, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Spelt, cooked
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Spelt, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 127 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Spelt, cooked has 41% more |
| Protein | 5.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Spelt, cooked has 174% more |
| Carbs | 26.44 g ★ | 20.71 g | Spelt, cooked has 28% more |
| Fat | 0.85 g | 0.15 g ★ | Spelt, cooked has 467% more |
| Fiber | 3.9 g ★ | 3.3 g | Spelt, cooked has 18% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 1.67 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Spelt, cooked has 142% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 143 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.