SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 151 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato has 68% more |
| Protein | 9.12 g ★ | 2.01 g | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato has 354% more |
| Carbs | 22.91 g ★ | 20.71 g | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato has 11% more |
| Fat | 2.53 g | 0.15 g ★ | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato has 1587% more |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Sugar | 3.54 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Sodium | 396 mg | 36 mg ★ | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato has 1000% more |
| Calcium | 169 mg ★ | 38 mg | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato has 345% more |
| Iron | 1.78 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | SUBWAY, black forest ham sub on white bread with lettuce and tomato has 158% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.9 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Potassium | 367 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.