Succotash, (corn and limas), raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), raw
10 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
1 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 99 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Protein | 5.03 g ★ | 4.4 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 14% more |
| Carbs | 19.59 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 8% more |
| Fat | 1.02 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Fiber | 3.8 g ★ | 2.8 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 36% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 43% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 17 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 6% more |
| Iron | 1.83 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 23% more |
| Vitamin C | 15.1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 369 mg ★ | 172 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 115% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.