Succotash, (corn and limas), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Succotash, (corn and limas), raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 99 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 10% more |
| Protein | 5.03 g ★ | 2.01 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 150% more |
| Carbs | 19.59 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 5% more |
| Fat | 1.02 g | 0.15 g ★ | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 580% more |
| Fiber | 3.8 g ★ | 3.3 g | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 15% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 1.83 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Succotash, (corn and limas), raw has 165% more |
| Vitamin C | 15.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
| Potassium | 369 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.