Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 168 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 40% more |
| Protein | 13.19 g ★ | 4.4 g | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 200% more |
| Carbs | 18.28 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 14% more |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 1.92 g ★ | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 145% more |
| Fiber | 3.3 g ★ | 2.8 g | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 18% more |
| Sugar | 1.57 g | 0.87 g ★ | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 80% more |
| Sodium | 298 mg | 7 mg ★ | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 4157% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 17 mg | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 6% more |
| Iron | 0.66 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
| Potassium | 250 mg ★ | 172 mg | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.