Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 168 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 87% more |
| Protein | 13.19 g ★ | 2.01 g | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 556% more |
| Carbs | 18.28 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 12% more |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 0.15 g ★ | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 3033% more |
| Fiber | 3.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Equal |
| Sugar | 1.57 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Sodium | 298 mg | 36 mg ★ | Tamales, masa and pork filling (Hopi) has 728% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.66 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 4% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 250 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.