Tamales (Navajo) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tamales (Navajo)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Tamales (Navajo) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Tamales (Navajo) has 70% more |
| Protein | 6.28 g ★ | 2.01 g | Tamales (Navajo) has 212% more |
| Carbs | 18.12 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Fat | 6.12 g | 0.15 g ★ | Tamales (Navajo) has 3980% more |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 6% more |
| Sugar | 0.99 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sodium | 427 mg | 36 mg ★ | Tamales (Navajo) has 1086% more |
| Calcium | 29 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Iron | 1.22 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Tamales (Navajo) has 77% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.7 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Potassium | 131 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.