Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 78 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Protein | 9.04 g ★ | 4.4 g | Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 105% more |
| Carbs | 2.85 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 87% more |
| Fat | 4.17 g | 1.92 g ★ | Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 117% more |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 68% more |
| Sugar | 0.6 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 31% more |
| Sodium | 12 mg | 7 mg ★ | Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 71% more |
| Calcium | 201 mg ★ | 17 mg | Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 1082% more |
| Iron | 1.61 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 8% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Tofu, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 148 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 14% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.