Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 144 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 20% more |
| Protein | 17.27 g ★ | 4.4 g | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 293% more |
| Carbs | 2.78 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 87% more |
| Fat | 8.72 g | 1.92 g ★ | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 354% more |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 14 mg | 7 mg ★ | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 100% more |
| Calcium | 683 mg ★ | 17 mg | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 3918% more |
| Iron | 2.66 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 79% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 0% more |
| Potassium | 237 mg ★ | 172 mg | Tofu, raw, firm, prepared with calcium sulfate has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.