Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 76 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 37% more |
| Protein | 8.08 g ★ | 4.4 g | Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate has 84% more |
| Carbs | 1.87 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 91% more |
| Fat | 4.78 g | 1.92 g ★ | Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate has 149% more |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 89% more |
| Sugar | 0.62 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 7 mg | Equal |
| Calcium | 350 mg ★ | 17 mg | Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate has 1959% more |
| Iron | 5.36 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate has 260% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Tofu, raw, regular, prepared with calcium sulfate has 0% more |
| Potassium | 121 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.