Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 61 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 49% more |
| Protein | 7.17 g ★ | 4.4 g | Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 63% more |
| Carbs | 1.18 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
| Fat | 3.69 g | 1.92 g ★ | Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 92% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 93% more |
| Sugar | 0.7 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 20% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg | 7 mg ★ | Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 14% more |
| Calcium | 111 mg ★ | 17 mg | Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 553% more |
| Iron | 1.11 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 26% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.2 mg ★ | 0 mg | Tofu, soft, prepared with calcium sulfate and magnesium chloride (nigari) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 120 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.