Triticale vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Triticale
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Triticale | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 336 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Triticale has 180% more |
| Protein | 13.05 g ★ | 4.4 g | Triticale has 197% more |
| Carbs | 72.13 g ★ | 21.3 g | Triticale has 239% more |
| Fat | 2.09 g | 1.92 g ★ | Triticale has 9% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Calcium | 37 mg ★ | 17 mg | Triticale has 118% more |
| Iron | 2.57 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Triticale has 72% more |
| Potassium | 332 mg ★ | 172 mg | Triticale has 93% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.