Triticale vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Triticale
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Triticale | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 336 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Triticale has 273% more |
| Protein | 13.05 g ★ | 2.01 g | Triticale has 549% more |
| Carbs | 72.13 g ★ | 20.71 g | Triticale has 248% more |
| Fat | 2.09 g | 0.15 g ★ | Triticale has 1293% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 5 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more |
| Calcium | 37 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Iron | 2.57 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Triticale has 272% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 332 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.