Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen has 139% more |
| Protein | 9.45 g ★ | 2.01 g | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen has 370% more |
| Carbs | 31.89 g ★ | 20.71 g | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen has 54% more |
| Fat | 5.51 g | 0.15 g ★ | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen has 3573% more |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Sugar | 3.94 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 39% more |
| Sodium | 378 mg | 36 mg ★ | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen has 950% more |
| Calcium | 197 mg ★ | 38 mg | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen has 418% more |
| Iron | 2.13 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Turnover, meat- and cheese-filled, tomato-based sauce, reduced fat, frozen has 209% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 117 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 75% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.