Waterchestnuts, chinese, (matai), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Waterchestnuts, chinese, (matai), raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Waterchestnuts, chinese, (matai), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Waterchestnuts, chinese, (matai), raw has 8% more |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
| Carbs | 23.94 g ★ | 20.71 g | Waterchestnuts, chinese, (matai), raw has 16% more |
| Fat | 0.1 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Fiber | 3 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 9% more |
| Sugar | 4.8 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
| Sodium | 14 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.06 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 91% more |
| Vitamin C | 4 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Potassium | 584 mg ★ | 475 mg | Waterchestnuts, chinese, (matai), raw has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.