Wheat bran, crude vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat bran, crude
8 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
2 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat bran, crude | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Wheat bran, crude has 80% more |
| Protein | 15.55 g ★ | 4.4 g | Wheat bran, crude has 253% more |
| Carbs | 64.51 g ★ | 21.3 g | Wheat bran, crude has 203% more |
| Fat | 4.25 g | 1.92 g ★ | Wheat bran, crude has 121% more |
| Fiber | 42.8 g ★ | 2.8 g | Wheat bran, crude has 1429% more |
| Sugar | 0.41 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Calcium | 73 mg ★ | 17 mg | Wheat bran, crude has 329% more |
| Iron | 10.57 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Wheat bran, crude has 609% more |
| Potassium | 1182 mg ★ | 172 mg | Wheat bran, crude has 587% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.