Wheat bran, crude vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat bran, crude
8 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
3 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat bran, crude | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Wheat bran, crude has 140% more |
| Protein | 15.55 g ★ | 2.01 g | Wheat bran, crude has 674% more |
| Carbs | 64.51 g ★ | 20.71 g | Wheat bran, crude has 211% more |
| Fat | 4.25 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wheat bran, crude has 2733% more |
| Fiber | 42.8 g ★ | 3.3 g | Wheat bran, crude has 1197% more |
| Sugar | 0.41 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 73 mg ★ | 38 mg | Wheat bran, crude has 92% more |
| Iron | 10.57 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wheat bran, crude has 1432% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 1182 mg ★ | 475 mg | Wheat bran, crude has 149% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.