Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 364 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified has 304% more |
| Protein | 10.33 g ★ | 2.01 g | Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified has 414% more |
| Carbs | 76.31 g ★ | 20.71 g | Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified has 268% more |
| Fat | 0.98 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified has 553% more |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 252 mg ★ | 38 mg | Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified has 563% more |
| Iron | 4.64 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wheat flour, white, all-purpose, enriched, calcium-fortified has 572% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.