Wheat, hard red winter vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat, hard red winter
9 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
1 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat, hard red winter | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 327 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Wheat, hard red winter has 173% more |
| Protein | 12.61 g ★ | 4.4 g | Wheat, hard red winter has 187% more |
| Carbs | 71.18 g ★ | 21.3 g | Wheat, hard red winter has 234% more |
| Fat | 1.54 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 20% more |
| Fiber | 12.2 g ★ | 2.8 g | Wheat, hard red winter has 336% more |
| Sugar | 0.41 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Calcium | 29 mg ★ | 17 mg | Wheat, hard red winter has 71% more |
| Iron | 3.19 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Wheat, hard red winter has 114% more |
| Potassium | 363 mg ★ | 172 mg | Wheat, hard red winter has 111% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.