Wheat, hard red winter vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat, hard red winter
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat, hard red winter | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 327 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Wheat, hard red winter has 263% more |
| Protein | 12.61 g ★ | 2.01 g | Wheat, hard red winter has 527% more |
| Carbs | 71.18 g ★ | 20.71 g | Wheat, hard red winter has 244% more |
| Fat | 1.54 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wheat, hard red winter has 927% more |
| Fiber | 12.2 g ★ | 3.3 g | Wheat, hard red winter has 270% more |
| Sugar | 0.41 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 29 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
| Iron | 3.19 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wheat, hard red winter has 362% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 363 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 24% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.