Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 132 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked has 47% more |
| Protein | 5.71 g ★ | 2.01 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked has 184% more |
| Carbs | 27.6 g ★ | 20.71 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked has 33% more |
| Fat | 0.83 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked has 453% more |
| Fiber | 4.3 g ★ | 3.3 g | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked has 30% more |
| Sugar | 3.07 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
| Sodium | 8 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Iron | 1.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wheat, KAMUT khorasan, cooked has 155% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 164 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.