Wheat, soft red winter vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat, soft red winter
9 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
1 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat, soft red winter | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 331 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Wheat, soft red winter has 176% more |
| Protein | 10.35 g ★ | 4.4 g | Wheat, soft red winter has 135% more |
| Carbs | 74.24 g ★ | 21.3 g | Wheat, soft red winter has 249% more |
| Fat | 1.56 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Fiber | 12.5 g ★ | 2.8 g | Wheat, soft red winter has 346% more |
| Sugar | 0.41 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg ★ | 17 mg | Wheat, soft red winter has 59% more |
| Iron | 3.21 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Wheat, soft red winter has 115% more |
| Potassium | 397 mg ★ | 172 mg | Wheat, soft red winter has 131% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.