Wheat, soft red winter vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Wheat, soft red winter
6 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
5 wins
| Nutrient | Wheat, soft red winter | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 331 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Wheat, soft red winter has 268% more |
| Protein | 10.35 g ★ | 2.01 g | Wheat, soft red winter has 415% more |
| Carbs | 74.24 g ★ | 20.71 g | Wheat, soft red winter has 258% more |
| Fat | 1.56 g | 0.15 g ★ | Wheat, soft red winter has 940% more |
| Fiber | 12.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Wheat, soft red winter has 279% more |
| Sugar | 0.41 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 27 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more |
| Iron | 3.21 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Wheat, soft red winter has 365% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 397 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.